To what extent do we decide who deserves to receive medical treatment? In an ideal world, everyone should have access to a house, education, water and health services.
How many of us live in a country where for the most part, we have access to a national health system? It is not to say that problems with negligence and delayed treatment do not affect people under this model. Such a system is not a panacea. Being grateful for health is something that many forget until having an illness. How many of us worry about the cost of a medical consultation or the price of occupying a hospital bed? Although many people have medical insurance, the cost of treatment for illnesses requires refinancing a house. Upon entering the hospital, they are asked ‘what type which type of insurance do you have?’ What happens to people on a low income and workers without insurance?
In 2009, I faced this dilemma when I left England to volunteer in Monterrey, Mexico. Working in the Adelaida Lafón Clinic, in the Fomerrey 35 neighbourhood, within a privatised system made me reflect about a model that decides who enters. Going to houses where people are sick with stage four cancer, kidney failure from diabetes and complications from drug use highlights a humanitarian crisis in a world between people with and without money. Although the clinic helps the most vulnerable people at a low cost, how many remain without this mercy?
As previously questioned, who deserves to live? Do you agree with a system that does not recognise people without medical insurance? Do you think that medical treatment is a privilege that should be earned through working, or is it simply a human right? Do you live with this dilemma in your country. Do you think about your health often? Are you grateful for being healthy?